Programming concepts and misconceptions in grade 5 and 6 children: Developing and testing a new assessment toolMarco HartmannPeter EdelsbrunnerMichael HielscherGiulia PaparoBeat Döbeli HoneggerEva Marinus
Marco Hartmann
Peter Edelsbrunner
Michael Hielscher
Giulia Paparo
Beat Döbeli Honegger
Eva Marinus
2022
Atti del 5° Convegno sulle didattiche disciplinari
Many countries are implementing computer science education, including programming, into their school curricula. In primary school this topic is new, both for students and teachers. Even though there has been research into the difficulties that high school and adult students face when learning to program, not all these findings translate well to the cognitive abilities of younger students and the environment they learn in. Our research focuses on finding out which misconceptions about programming primary school children hold and develop. This is important because research from other fields has shown that knowledge about misconceptions can improve teaching. This project aims to develop a Programming Misconceptions Assessment Tool (ProMAT) for children in grades 5 and 6 that have learned to program using either xLogo or Scratch – two popular educational programming languages currently used in Switzerland. Ultimately, the project should result in an assessment tool that can be used both by researchers and practitioners interested in primary school children’s misconceptions about programming. In addition, it should reveal if and how educational programming environments affect the development of these misconceptions. The ProMAT is currently under development and underwent a first pilot testing phase with 57 children. In this paper, we describe the development of the first version of this tool, discuss insights gained from the pilot study, and outline the next steps of the project.
Study InformationManually extracted from the paper by the Progmiscon.org team
Programming Languages
Scratch
Method
Quantitative systematic research
Subjects
57 grade 5 or 6 students
Artifact
https://osf.io/5bxvp/?view_only=76b81b0a145e4836a0468773fe9eb1aaRelated Study ResultsPhenomena studied in this paper that map to Progmiscon.org misconceptions
The following list summarizes those phenomena reported in this study that provide evidence for misconceptions documented on Progmiscon.org. (The paper may provide evidence for other misconceptions as well. This list focuses exclusively on misconceptions documented on Progmiscon.org.)
Mistakes in Test ItemsProMAT 1.1 (Scratch) Test Items
P5
ProMAT 1.1, Aufgabe P5
Students making this error
This provides evidence potentially relevant for the following Progmiscon.org misconceptions:
P11
ProMAT 1.1, Aufgabe P11
Students making this error
This provides evidence potentially relevant for the following Progmiscon.org misconceptions:
P13
ProMAT 1.1, Aufgabe P13
Students making this error
This provides evidence potentially relevant for the following Progmiscon.org misconceptions:
P8
ProMAT 1.1, Aufgabe P8
Students making this error
This provides evidence potentially relevant for the following Progmiscon.org misconceptions:
P9
ProMAT 1.1, Aufgabe P9
Students making this error
This provides evidence potentially relevant for the following Progmiscon.org misconceptions: