Identifying student misconceptions of programming
Lisa C. Kaczmarczyk
Elizabeth R. Petrick
J. Philip East
Geoffrey L. Herman

2010

Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium on Computer science education - SIGCSE '10

Computing educators are often baffled by the misconceptions that their CS1 students hold. We need to understand these misconceptions more clearly in order to help students form correct conceptions. This paper describes one stage in the development of a concept inventory for Computing Fundamentals: investigation of student misconceptions in a series of core CS1 topics previously identified as both important and difficult. Formal interviews with students revealed four distinct themes, each containing many interesting misconceptions. Three of those misconceptions are detailed in this paper: two misconceptions about memory models, and data assignment when primitives are declared. Individual misconceptions are related, but vary widely, thus providing excellent material to use in the development of the CI. In addition, CS1 instructors are provided immediate usable material for helping their students understand some difficult introductory concepts.

Study Information
Manually extracted from the paper by the Progmiscon.org team

Programming Languages

Java

Method

Qualitative (interviews)

Subjects

10 undergraduate students

Artifact

Note by Progmiscon.org Team
We are not aware of an artifact supporting this paper.

Related Study Results
Phenomena studied in this paper that map to Progmiscon.org misconceptions

The following list summarizes those phenomena reported in this study that provide evidence for misconceptions documented on Progmiscon.org. (The paper may provide evidence for other misconceptions as well. This list focuses exclusively on misconceptions documented on Progmiscon.org.)

Misconceptions
Misconceptions related to memory

PVR1
Primitive no default
This provides evidence potentially relevant for the following Progmiscon.org misconceptions:
MMR4
Uninstantiated memory allocation
This provides evidence potentially relevant for the following Progmiscon.org misconceptions: